
Cole Commission
ignores Health, Safety and 'Phoenixing'.
This was my
contribution to the Senate's consideration of the APPROPRIATION BILL (NO
3)
and APPROPRIATION BILL (NO 4) on
the 27 March 2003
In December last year, I gave adjournment speech to the
Senate on the progress of the Royal Commission into the building and
construction industry, the Cole Commission. In that speech I outlined my
concerns about the failure of the Commission to investigate all areas of the
industry. In particular to investigate the failure of employers in the industry
to comply with occupational health and safety laws and regulations, and the
prevalence of industry practices such as tax evasion and ‘phoenixing’. This is
the practice of liquidating one company which then resurfaces in a slightly
different form, thereby avoiding tax liabilities and depriving workers of their
legal entitlements, amongst other things.
Most particularly, I expressed my deep concern about the
industrial relations agenda of the Howard Government, and in particular
Workplace Relations Minister Tony Abbott, in establishing this royal commission.
This agenda is one of explicit anti-unionism; my concern was that the royal
commission was established not to investigate the industry, and thus respond to
the claims of workers and unions involved of corruption within it, but as an
exercise in union bashing. The tabling of the report in Parliament and the
statement made by Tony Abbott yesterday has confirmed all my concerns.
The report, after a year of investigations and, as Tony
Abbott pointed out in his statement yesterday, conducted “171 public sitting
days … Some 16 000 pages of transcript were taken from 765 witnesses.”
Yet the report contains only two specific findings of breaches of health and
safety by employers. As a former occupational health and safety officer with
the CFMEU and a former worker in the industry, I find this result astounding.
On average, one worker is killed each week on Australian constructions sites due
to workplace accidents.
I have encountered a multitude of cases in which workers
have been injured and, in some cases, disabled as a result of accidents on
construction sites. A significant proportion of these accidents can be
attributed to the failure of employers to meet OH&S standards, which are a legal
requirement. The CFMEU, in conjunction with other unions, has campaigned
consistently and strongly on this issue, emphasising the prevalence of
non-compliance and the severity of consequences for these failings for their
members. Yet the Cole Royal Commission did not produce a single statement
demonstrating illegal or unsafe work practices in NSW.
Similarly, not a single witness statement was produced by
the Cole Royal Commission alleging tax rorts in New South Wales, or regarding
the practice of ‘phoenixing’. This despite the Australian Tax Office estimation
that the building industry fails to declare up to 40% of its income, and warning
of the prevalence of phoenixing. These practices mean that government
treasuries are starved of tax payments and workers entitlement payments withheld
to maximise profits. Workers of the industry suffer as a result of loss of pay
and entitlements, as well as problems with workers compensation in the event of
injury that arise through these practices.
The CFMEU has worked over a number of years and throughout
this commission process to bring these matters to the attention of government.
Yet despite the prevalence of these practices and the severity of their effect,
as my Labor colleague Robert McClelland highlighted yesterday,
“incredibly, there is not a
single specific finding of unlawful conduct relating to underpayment of workers’
entitlements … avoidance of tax, or sham sub-contracting or phoenix company
restructuring in the industry.”
The Royal Commission, despite the tremendous cost to the
Australian taxpayer, has failed to address either of these areas of vital
concern, among others. These are the areas of the industry that matter to the
workers within it, as it is they who are the victims of these endemic problems.
Yet their testimony has been virtually ignored - only 7 hours of hearing time
was spent listening to workers of the industry, yet hearing time devoted to
employers and their representatives was astoundingly over forty times
that.
As representatives of these workers, the unions involved
and particularly the CFMEU sought to bring these matters to the attention of the
investigation, yet these attempts were also rebuffed. This is because this
commission was never established to investigate the vast scope of genuine
problems in the building and construction industry. It has, since inception, had
an explicitly political agenda, as an investigation into the industry was turned
unashamedly into a union-bashing exercise.
90% of public hearing time was dedicated to anti-union
subjects. 81% was spent attacking my union, the CFMEU. This is the union that
has sought to represent workers within the building and construction industry,
both to government and to the commission’s investigation, only to be ignored.
Minister Abbott has just tabled one of the most expensive
political tools in Australian history. He has tailored a necessary
investigation into one of the most dangerous sectors of employment in the
country to suit his own political ends. This commission has failed to
investigate some of the most crucial problems in the building and construction
industry: major problems areas that cost lives.
The areas of health and safety compliance and tax avoidance
within the industry impact heavily on workers in the industry and on Australian
taxpayers. Not only is he failing to address these fundamental issues, but his
motivation is to crush one of the few protections available to workers and their
families in this industry, the right to collective organisation through trade
unions. In the words of my colleague, Mr Robert McClelland, yesterday,
“… we will not see this report
used by the Howard Government as a political tool to advance a divisive
industrial relations agenda.”
We will continue to fight for the rights of workers in this
country, and for the level of government intervention needed to address these
major problems within the building and construction industry.

