May 2002

Home Local Issues About Kate Lundy Media Index

 May 2002 June 2002

bullet

30 May 2002 - PM must reprimand Nelson for misrepresenting Senator Lundy

bullet

29 May 2002 - 7.30 Report makes more Australians aware of Telstra Pair Gains

bullet

27 May 2002 - Telstra finally 'fesses up – over 1 million Telstra customers affected by pair gain.

bullet

24 May 2002 - Ruddock ignores importance of Indigenous sport 

bullet

23 May 2002 - Kate Lundy speaks at ACT 'Labor for Refugees' Forum

bullet

22 May 2002 - Why can’t we see the Super 12 final?

bullet

22 May 2002 - Senator Lundy welcomes announcement of ICT Centre of Excellence

bullet

21 May 2002 - Kemp can’t be trusted on AIS funding

bullet

20 May 2002 - ICT Industry gives Coalition’s Budget an “F”, as Alston disappoints

bullet

17 May 2002 - Alston’s Department skims $1.5 million from ICT Centre of Excellence

bullet

16 May 2002 - Queanbeyan Defence HQ - Another Reith deception

bullet

16 May 2002- Coalition is confused: what is ICT?

bullet

16 May 2002 - Coalition covers up impact of ICT trade deficit

bullet

15 May 2002 - Coalition abandons broadband internet

bullet

15 May 2002 - Australian cricket team wins Laureus World Sport Award

bullet

15 May 2002 - AIS upgrade welcome, but no long-term plan for sport in Budget

bullet15 May 2002 - When too much sport is too much
bullet14 May 2002 - ICT ignored; NOIE knee-capped
bullet

8 May 2002 - Domestic sports coverage suffers another setback

bullet7 May 2002 - Government fails local IT SMEs – again
bullet7 May 2002 - Coalition’s outsourcing policies are neglecting ICT job creation
bullet6 May 2002 - Reckless IT outsourcing promises come back to haunt Coalition
bullet2 May 2002 - New magazine to fill netball information gap
bullet2 May 2002 - Howard Government’s continued scorn for Canberra

30 May 2002 - Media Release

PM must reprimand Nelson for misrepresenting Senator Lundy

The Prime Minister must reprimand the Minister for Education and Training, Brendan Nelson for misrepresenting Senator Lundy in Question Time today.

The Minister misled the House by wrongly attributing quotes made in a media release dated May 20 2002 to Senator Lundy (a copy of the release is attached).

In her release, Senator Lundy had used specific quotes from members of the Information and Communications Technology (ICT) industry to illustrate their widespread disappointment with the Coalition’s Budget.

It is disappointing that the only response that the Coalition can manage to offer to the concerns of the ICT industry is to mislead Parliament by levelling baseless accusations at a Labor member.

The Coalition released an unsatisfactory ICT budget, and the whole industry knows it.  Brendan Nelson must immediately apologise for misrepresenting Senator Lundy.

Media contact: Simon Tatz on 02 6277 3334 or 0418 488 295

29 May 2002 - Media Release

7.30 Report makes more Australians aware of Telstra Pair Gains

The 7.30 Report’s expose of Telstra’s use of pair gain technology last night has made more Australians aware that they are being short changed by the giant telco, the Shadow Minister for Information Technology, Senator Kate Lundy, said today.

“Within a couple of hours of last night’s 7.30 Report, I received dozens of responses to my Pair Gain Victims web site, mostly from people who have never been told by Telstra that a pair gain might be the cause of their slow internet connection and inability to get broadband,” Senator Lundy said.

“These are just some of the one million or so people who have a pair gain connection, but have never been told because of Telstra’s policy to keep them secret.

Here are some comments received last night from Australians with a pair gain:

bulletPrior to the 7:30 report last evening, I thought my predicament was an isolated instance.
bulletI have been labouring under Telstra's pair gain system which has given me only half of the telephone line that other people have … I demand Telstra refund me half of what I have paid in line rental in the past.
bulletThanks at last for finding other people who understand the frustration of Telstra. I suffer from the Telstra affliction at both my home and my office, forcing me to use high cost ISDN at the office and a clumsy and expensive satellite system at home.
bulletWhen requesting a second phone line installed, I queried if ADSL would be available on the new line and was told that it would be … Now I am stuck with … two lines that are incapable of ADSL. I unfortunately did not know that my original line was pair gain nor was I told when it was installed.

“Clearly, Telstra can not hide this problem from Australians any longer.  Customers are waking up to the true extent of its backward thinking.

“I eagerly await the results of the ACCC investigation into Telstra over this issue, but in the mean time, I call on the Minister for Communications to join me in demanding that Telstra be honest with their customers,” Senator Lundy concluded.

Senator Lundy’s Pair Gain Victim web site is located at http://www.katelundy.com.au/Pairgainvictims.htm

Media Contact: Simon Tatz on 6277 3334 or 0418 488 295

27 May 2002 - Media Release

Telstra finally 'fesses up – over 1 million Telstra customers affected by pair gain.

Under pressure from Senator Kate Lundy’s ‘Pair Gain Victims’ campaign, Telstra has finally revealed the full impact of its use of pair gains, telling a Senate Estimates committee that one million customers are affected by the technology.

Previously, Telstra had stated that nine percent of its connections used a pair gain, but in Senate Estimates yesterday, it conceded that this amounted to one million customers.

“That’s one million customers who have to put up with inferior internet speeds and telephone services, and one million customers who, Telstra has also admitted, cannot receive its ADSL broadband service,” Senator Lundy said.

“Of this one million, at least 125, 000 are rural and regional people, accessing the internet via the inferior service provided through pair-gains.  Any claim that Telstra is improving services to the bush is ridiculous.

“Although such a large number of Australians have been supplied with pair gain technology, Telstra’s policy of secrecy remains: by its own admission it does not to inform its customers when a pair gain is used, even though it reduces internet speed, denies access to ADSL broadband, and in some circumstances may restrict normal telephone use.

“This practice also raises questions whether Telstra’s recent advertising of its broadband services may be misleading.  These adverts make no mention of the fact that a million customers can not receive ADSL because of pair gain technology.”

Pair gain technology involves splitting the single telephone line into two halves.  Telstra has already confirmed that when many customers order a second dedicated phone line, they simply split the phone line in two – but charge for a completely new service.  This can effectively halve the available bandwidth, often reducing capacity to no more than 28 kilo bits per second, regardless of the modem used.

“Telstra can no longer dance around, denying that its use of pair gain technology is a problem, because one million Australians are proving that it is wrong. It must meet its social obligations, invest in the community, and provide a twenty-first century network,” Senator Lundy concluded

Media Contact: Simon Tatz on 6277 3334 or 0418 488 295

24 May 2002 - Joint Media Release

Senator Kate Lundy- Shadow Minister for Sport
and
Carmen Lawrence MP- Shadow Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island Affairs and Reconciliation

Ruddock ignores importance of Indigenous sport 

Sport and physical activities are tremendously important to Aboriginal and Islander people, yet Minister Ruddock did not even mention this in his budget statement on Indigenous Affairs.

Indigenous Australians are still being discriminated against in terms of sporting opportunities and sporting infrastructure.  Yet there is no money, programs or even a mention of this in the budget. 

The Australian Sports Commission provides only $1.5 million for Indigenous Sport, a paltry amount considering the overwhelming disadvantages that confront Indigenous sport.  There is an urgent need for sporting infrastructure and expertise in Aboriginal and Islander communities. 

In fact, a 1997 House of Representatives report found that nearly every Indigenous community listed as their number one priority sport and recreational activities – before clean water, before 24-hour power, before roads.  This is no doubt because of the important role sport plays in health and self esteem.  Sport and recreational activities contribute to better health and social outcomes in Indigenous communities.

But despite the urgent need to improve Aboriginal and Islander sporting opportunities, the Howard Government has done little for Indigenous sport, other than host a cricket match in Canberra – a match which ATSIC was required to fund, at a cost of $100,000.

Where are the training camps, mentoring programs and sports science for Aboriginal and Islander athletes, Mr Ruddock?  Where are the infrastructure programs so that young Aboriginal and Islander children can play on decent fields, train with proper coaches, have access to sports medicine and attend regular, organised sporting events?  Where are the schemes to help overcome the tyranny of distance, which prevents many Indigenous athletes from competing in events and competitions?

It is not enough to just honour those who have brought sporting glory to Australia.  Every Indigenous child and teenager needs access to sporting fun and opportunities.

Australia has a pitiful and disgraceful history of discrimination in sport, and this must be addressed as part of any strategy to improve the image and identity of Indigenous people.

  Media contacts: Carmen Lawrence (Jo Fox 041 996 3486) Kate Lundy (Simon Tatz 0418 488 295)

23 May 2002 - Notice

Kate Lundy speaks at ACT 'Labor for Refugees' Forum

The community needs fundamentally to rethink the language it uses to describe Australia’s refugee situation before real humanitarian progress can be made, the Senator for the ACT, Kate Lundy said last night.

Speaking at a Public Forum on refugee policy, Senator Lundy said expressed her opinion on a range of issues relating to refugee policy: “John Howard co-opted the legitimate terminology that applies to one mechanism of protecting our freedoms and used it to undermine our core values.

“He took ‘border protection’ and turned it into code for treating a group of desperate people as less than human.”

Senator Lundy called for a shift in the way the community interprets the refugee issue, and called on the Labor Party to be responsive to the values in the community.

“We should stop using the language of John Howard. That is the language of racism and victimisation of those most in need.  We should not reinforce the perception that asylum seekers are a threat and should be feared.  We should not contribute to a self-fulling prophecy where asylum seekers are assumed to be guilty of something and therefore treated as convicted felons.

“We need to remind ourselves that seeking asylum is not an illegal activity.  Asylum seekers are not illegal immigrants until their claims have been tested under Australian law, and found to be wanting.

“Labor is committed to developing a comprehensive and lasting solution on these issues.  That is why Labor’s conversation with the community on this issue is so important.  We must consult directly and we must make ourselves open and accessible to the views of all.”

Click here for the full text of the address.

Media Contact: Simon Tatz: 02 6277 3334; 0418 488 295

22 May 2002 - Media Release

Why can’t we see the Super 12 final?

Once again, sports fans are being dudded.

This Saturday, the ACT Brumbies defend their Super 12 title against the undefeated Canterbury Crusaders in Christchurch. The match begins at 5.30 Eastern Standard Time; yet the Super 12 final will not be shown on free-to-air television. In fact, it will not be shown in NSW or the ACT until the following day.

The Super 12 final will be shown on Foxtel, who have done an excellent job in promoting and broadcasting the Super 12 series. The majority of the community, however, do not subscribe to

pay-television; either because they cannot afford to or are unable to access a pay-television service.

It is simply unfair that rugby fans across Australia, and in the ACT in particular, are being denied a chance to watch the Brumbies play in the Super 12 final.

It is very concerning that the people of Canberra are being denied the opportunity to watch the Super 12 final on free-to-air television.

Clearly, the Coalition’s anti-siphoning legislation needs revision.

The Government has had seven years to note the impact of pay-television on sporting coverage. It is now obvious that the anti-siphoning list needs to be revised so that it takes into account critical finals and similar events not available on free-to-air television.

Senator Alston, the Minister for Communications, must ensure that this situation does not occur again.

Media Contact: Simon Tatz on 6277 3334 or 0418 488 295

22 May 2002 - Media Release

Senator Lundy welcomes announcement of ICT Centre of Excellence

Canberra’s status as a leading centre for Information and Communications Technology (ICT) was given a boost by today’s announcement that the National ICT Australia consortium has been awarded the right to manage Australia’s ICT Centre of Excellence, the Shadow Minister for Information Technology, Senator Kate Lundy, said today.

“The ICT Centre of Excellence announcement marks a solitary bright spot in the Coalition’s otherwise barren commitment to the development of Australia’s ICT industry. We have been waiting for a long time to hear who the successful proponent would be,” Senator Lundy said.

“The choice of National ICT Australia to run the Centre recognises the contribution of the ACT region to the ICT sector.  We have a proud and dynamic coterie of Australian small and medium-sized enterprises, particularly in the software sector.

“I hope that the critical mass in research and development generated here by the Centre will lead to greater commercialisation of R&D and the creation of new start-up companies.  These will be important knowledge jobs for the ACT region.

“It appears there was a competitive field vying for the privilege of managing the Centre, and it is heartening to see that innovative work is being performed by other organisations in the private sector.  I urge the Government to provide more opportunities so that the Australian ICT sector can continue to grow.”  Senator Lundy concluded.

Media Contact: Simon Tatz: 02 6277 3334; 0418 488 295

21 May 2002 - Media Release

Kemp can’t be trusted on AIS funding

Rod Kemp may be looking to use the proposed Gungahlin Drive extension as an excuse to withhold $65 million in Commonwealth funding for the Bruce campus of the Australian Institute of Sport (AIS).

In a Media Release on 16 May, Senator Kemp implied that the $65 million would only be spent if the proposed Gungahlin Drive extension were abandoned.

Senator Kemp, Australian Sports Commission Chairman Peter Bartels and CEO Mark Peters have all publicly linked the future of the AIS with the proposed Gungahlin extension.  They are demonstrating a degree of contempt by not indicating a willingness to negotiate with the ACT Government.

The Gungahlin Drive extension issue was decided at the last ACT election, and the ACT Government is currently negotiating in good faith to address the concerns of the AIS and to work constructively towards a satisfactory outcome.  

However, Senator Kemp’s political intervention appears to be laying the groundwork for the Coalition to withhold their proposed funding for the AIS.   After all, they have form in this regard. 

The Howard Government has already shown they can’t be trusted to honour their election promises when it comes to sport funding.  In May 2001, the Coalition pledged $90 million for capital works associated with the upgrading of the Melbourne Cricket Ground (MCG) for the staging of the 2006 Commonwealth Games.  The Coalition now claims that the $90 million is contingent on the imposition of the Coalition’s industrial relations laws. 

I call on Senator Kemp to guarantee today that funding for the AIS is not contingent on the abandonment of the proposed Gungahlin Drive extension.

Media contact:  Simon Tatz on 6277 3334 or 0418 488 295

20 May 2002 - Media Release

ICT Industry gives Coalition’s Budget an “F”, as Alston disappoints

The information and communications technology (ICT) sector feels let down by the Federal Budget, and the Minister for IT should have better represented the industry in Cabinet, the Shadow Minister for IT, Senator Kate Lundy said today.

“One week after the Federal Budget was announced, the Information and Communications Technology sector’s evaluation of the Coalition’s commitment to ICT has been a negative one,” Senator Lundy said.

“The IT training commitment is seen as next to worthless, there is a great deal of anger over the decision to freeze the R&D Start program, and the protection afforded to the National Information Infrastructure is almost non-existent.  Overall, it is a budget with no vision.

“I think it is fair to say that the sector is disappointed by the Federal Budget,” Senator Lundy said.  “Quite clearly, ICT is not seen by the Coalition as the way forward for Australian industry.

“This is a shame, because the information and communications technology sector represents the high road to Australian prosperity.  The Labor Party has consistently emphasised the importance of a smart, value-adding, industry, driven by Australian entrepreneurs.  We want to ensure high paying, skilled employment for Australians into the future, and the ICT sector is a crucial part of this.

“Ultimately this is an issue for all Australians, because, if this industry falls by the wayside, our ability to provide ourselves a fair and prosperous society will fall with it.  I think that it’s time Senator Alston took an interest in his portfolio, and started defending it in the Cabinet.” Senator Lundy concluded

For industry comments, please refer to the attached “Report Card”

Media contact: Simon Tatz on 02 6277 3334 or 0418 488 295

Coalition Budget Report Card: what the ICT Industry said

Overall: 1/10

“Overall this year’s budget provides the industry with a few opportunities, however, what it gives with one hand it more than takes back with the other – cuts to funding for ICT policy and R&D investment signal a lack of regard for an industry that is a proven driver of economic growth.”

– Rob Durie, Executive Director, Australian Information Industry Association

“Information Technology took a back seat in 2002-2003 Federal Budget”

– Computerworld

“The Information Technology sector has been left scrambling for crumbs in the Federal Budget for 2002-2003.”

– Sydney Morning Herald

“The tight spending constraints mean that we are not going to see a kick-start to the tech sector from any Government pump priming.”

– Peter Coroneos, President, Internet Industry Association

“I don’t think this budget has anything in it that addresses the current industry situation.”

– Iain Birks, CEO, Ideas International

 IT Skills Training: 1/10

“A major IT educator [Dimension Data Learning Services] has slammed the Federal Government’s $23.2 million age computer training initiative as ‘a joke’ and claimed the money could have been better spent elsewhere.”

– The Australian

“The allocation of funding for IT skills training … is not sufficient in terms of targeting or funding to have any real impact in rectifying the industry’s concerns regarding ICT skills.”

– Rob Durie, AIIA

“The Australian Computer Society was unimpressed with the mature-age IT skills scheme, noting that $500 would not go a long way in computer education.”

– The Australian

R&D Start Freeze: 0/10

“Perhaps the ugliest of this year’s budget is the impact of the Government’s freeze on the R&D Start Program … It will limit the ability of innovative Australian companies to develop new technologies and compete in the global market.”

– Rob Durie, AIIA

 National Information Infrastructure Security: 2/10

“The Federal budget has failed to deliver adequate protection for the National Information Infrastructure [NII] … it will only spend a paltry 32 cents per head of population on protecting the NII (which comprises information systems that control critical sectors such as telecommunications, transport and distribution, energy and utilities, and banking and finance) over the next 4 years”

– Leif Gamertsfelder, Head, E-security group, Deacons law firm

“Evidently the prospect of terrorist initiated cyber-attack remains too theoretical a possibility in the mind of Treasury to warrant much of a commitment.”

– Peter Coroneos, IIA

17 May 2002 - Media Release

Alston’s Department skims $1.5 million from ICT Centre of Excellence

Minister Alston should explain why it costs his Department $1.5 million to administer the first instalment ($7.3 million) of the ICT Centre of Excellence, the Shadow Minister for Information Technology, Senator Kate Lundy, said today.

“In a decidedly murky set of budget papers, the allocation for the ICT Centre of Excellence appeared to be only $7.3 million. Given that the Minister asserts that the full $8.8 million will still be spent, I can only assume that this means his department will be spending $1.5 million to administer the program,” Senator Lundy said.

“I am glad the Minister has drawn attention to the fact that a large sum of tax payers’ money is being skimmed off the funding allocated to the ICT Centre of Excellence,

“I call upon the Minister to disclose the details of this $1.5 million expenditure. In particular he should provide an explanation as to why the administration of this program is costing approximately 17% of the annual funding allocation.

“Clearly this is an attempt by Minister Alston to bloat departmental funding at the expense of the ICT Centre of Excellence initiative,” Senator Lundy concluded.

Media Contact: Simon Tatz (02) 6277 3334 or 0418 488 295

16 May 2002 - Joint Media Release

Queanbeyan Defence HQ - Another Reith deception

In Question Time today the Minister for Defence today admitted no funding has been committed to the promised Defence Headquarters at Bungendore.

On 3 October 2001, two days before the election was called, the then Minister for Defence Peter Reith announced that the Government “will construct the new Headquarters Australian Theatre at a site outside Queanbeyan.”

The Defence Portfolio Budget Statement, released on Tuesday, clearly lists the Headquarters Australian Theatre with “projects proposed for Government approval in 2002-03” (page 76).

In other words, the Government has not made a decision on where the Headquarters will be situated and when it will be built.

In response to a written question the Government has also confirmed that landowners affected by the announcement were first consulted on 5 October 2001, two days after the announcement was made.

The Howard Government has been caught out hurriedly announcing as fact a project days before the election in a marginal seat, when no decision had been made.

The Minister today, in response to a question, could only wave his arms and say that the project would be located “in the region” and would begin “as soon as possible”.

Labor supports projects that inject investment and jobs in the Queanbeyan and ACT regions and calls on the Government to immediately commit to when and where the HQ will be built.

For comment/information: Chris Evans 0419 983 593  Simon Tatz 0418 488 295

16 May 2002 - Media Release

Coalition is confused: what is ICT?

The Budget offered some insight into how the Federal Government has made such a mess of Australia’s Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) industries – they don’t really understand what ICT is!

In a desperate attempt to hide the massive blow-out in Australia’s ICT trade deficit, the Coalition suggests ICT only relates to computer hardware.  The Budget stated:

“Effectively, ICT is now a commodity.  It is characterised by a relatively homogenous product – the integrated circuit and memory chips”

(Source: Budget Strategy and Outlook 2002-03 (Budget Paper No. 1), 4-27)

This statement is astonishing.  It is the equivalent of saying that the automotive industry consists solely of tyre manufacturing.

The Howard Government does not consider software, integration services, communications equipment, networking equipment, and internet digital content as being information and communications technology.  Does it expect us to believe that imported products such as Microsoft software do not contribute to the ICT trade deficit?

Is it any wonder the Australian Government’s ICT policy is treated as a laughing stock internationally and Minister Alston has been dubbed the “World’s Greatest Luddite” when nonsense such as this appears in the Federal Budget?  (Source: www.google.com, search term “world's greatest luddite”)

Meanwhile, the Coalition has done nothing to assist Australia’s domestic ICT sector in this budget – the R&D Start program remains frozen, and their IT outsourcing industry development policies remain a shambles.  It is no wonder that industry groups such as the AIIA are so disappointed.

John Howard should realise that for every second his policies stall the information economy the ICT deficit grows.  Ultimately it’s Australian ICT jobs that will be foregone.

Media Contact: Simon Tatz: 02 6277 3334; 0418 488 295

16 May 2002 - Media Release

Coalition covers up impact of ICT trade deficit

The evaluation in the Budget of the effect of the Information and Communications Technology (ICT) sector on Australia’s terms of trade is alarming.

Currently, Australia imports far more ICT products and services than it exports.  The ICT trade deficit has been growing at alarming rates, with very little policy emphasis on the need to increase Australia’s export of ICT products and services to check this disturbing trend.

Yet in the Budget, the Coalition made several statements that claim Australia’s dependence on ICT imports was in fact favourable to our economy.  The Budget states:

“A … factor, contributing to Australia’s strengthening terms of trade, is significant falls in the prices of Australia’s imports, especially for information and communications technology (ICT) goods."

 “the most rapid downward price trend has been for ICT, which has grown substantially as a net import to Australia.”

 “The rapid fall in ICT prices, combined with Australia’s status as a net importer of ICT goods, has had favourable implications for Australia’s terms of trade.”

(Source: Budget Strategy and Outlook 2002-03 (Budget Paper No. 1), pages 4-3, 4-18, and 4-26)

The Coalition has tried to turn a negative outcome into a positive, by claiming that Australia’s shocking status as a net importer of ICT goods is in fact beneficial to our economic development.

This cover-up would be ludicrous if it wasn’t so disgraceful.

In reality, ICT hardware accounts for around 16% of Australia’s total merchandise imports – more than food, textiles, clothing, footwear, civil aircraft, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, books, toys, and leisure goods combined.  The total ICT deficit is even greater (see attached fact sheet).

Labor believes that Australia needs to be a producer, not just a consumer, of ICT goods and services, and is the only party

Media Contact: Simon Tatz: 02 6277 3334; 0418 488 295

Fact Sheet: the true story of ICT terms of trade

(Source: Australian ICT Trade Update 2001, Centre for Economic Studies, 2001)

ICT equipment trade
bulletin 2000-01nbsp; the deficit on ICT equipment alone reached just over $16 billion, excluding re-exports;
bulletover the decade from 1990-01 to 2000-01, Australia has raked up a $94 billion deficit on trade in ICT equipment – approximately $5,000 for every man woman and child;
bulletICT equipment accounts for around 16% of Australia’s total merchandise imports – costing more than cars and fuel combined, and more than imports of food, textiles, clothing, footwear, civil aircraft, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, books, toys and leisure goods combined;
bulletDuring 1999, Australia ranked 24th among 28 OECD countries in terms of the value of the ICT equipment surplus/deficit per 1000 population.
ICT services trade
bulletin 2000-01 the deficit on ICT services was around $720 million, discounting the one-off impact of the Sydney Olympics;
bulletSince 1993-94, Australia’s accumulated deficit on ICT services approaches $3.4 billion.
Combined ICT Equipment and Services
bulletin 2000-01 the combined ICT deficit was around $17 billion, discounting the one-off impact of the Sydney Olympics;
bulletOver the six years from 1995-96 to 2000-01, Australia’s deficit on ICT trade has amounted to almost $67 billion;
bulletAustralia’s ICT imports continue to grow faster than exports.

15 May 2002 - Media Release

Coalition abandons broadband internet

This budget has ignored an election promise on broadband, demonstrating how little an interest the Coalition has in modern Information and Communications Technology (ICT), the Shadow Minister for Information Technology, Senator Kate Lundy said today.

“Overall, last night’s budget showed that the Coalition’s interest in Information and Communications Technology was just a passing fad,” Senator Lundy said.

“Notable amongst the gaping hole of Coalition initiatives to remedy Australia’s woeful broadband penetration rate was the absence of the promised $2.1 million Broadband Content Fund.

“Although the amount involved was relatively small, this was a positive measure to drive the take-up rate of broadband internet in Australia by facilitating innovative content.

“It seemed important enough to the Coalition during the election campaign, but now that Peter Costello is concentrating on becoming the next Liberal Prime Minister, they are not interested in ICT issues,” Senator Lundy said.

During the 2001 election campaign the Coalition promised:

The Government understands that the development of compelling digital content and applications will be a key driver in promoting the take up of broadband technologies by consumers and businesses in Australia. Accordingly, the Government recently committed an additional $2.1 million to the funding of innovative broadband content.

(Our Future Action Plan Building an Information Economy for the 21st Century, p6)

“We shouldn’t underestimate the importance of broadband content development. Broadband internet will be an important contributor to the delivery of health, education and government services in the future, and good Government policy in this area would be to encourage the exploration of these possibilities now.

“Additionally, the bandwidth costs of importing foreign digital content from across the Pacific are quite considerable. This is why existing broadband providers argue they must cap their download limits. It has been estimated that 70-80 per cent of broadband content originates in the United States, and the slower we are to develop our own content here, the higher our broadband costs will be.” Senator Lundy said.

Media Contact: Simon Tatz: 02 6277 3334; 0418 488 295

15 May 2002 - Media Release

Australian cricket team wins Laureus World Sport Award

The Australian cricket team was last night awarded the prestigious 2002 Laureus World Sport Award for ‘Best Team of the Year’.

The Laureus World Sport Awards are the sporting equivalent of the Oscars and are held each year in Monte Carlo.

The Australian cricket team was nominated in the ‘World Team of the Year’ category, along with Bayern Munich (soccer); the French Davis Cup team (tennis); the Ferrari Formula One team (motor racing) and the Los Angeles Lakers (basketball).

The Australian cricket team’s award is a fantastic achievement.

It is recognition not just of the tremendous accomplishments of Steve Waugh and his team, but also the coaches, administrators and sport scientists involved with our national cricket side.

The Australian Cricket Board should also be congratulated for their tireless efforts in helping Australian cricket reach the pinnacle of world sport.

This year, Ian Thorpe (swimming) was runner up in the category of World Sportsman of the Year. Michael Schumacher won the award. Other nominations were Lance Armstrong (cycling); Maurice Green (athletics); Michael Schumacher (motor racing) and Tiger Woods (golf).

Media contact: Simon Tatz on 6277 3334 or 0418 488 295

15 May 2002 - Media Release

AIS upgrade welcome, but no long-term plan for sport in Budget

The Federal Budget reveals the Howard Government’s complete lack of a long-term vision for sport.

The Government’s decision to upgrade the Australian Institute of Sport (AIS) in Canberra is welcomed by the Labor Party because it helps ensure the sustainability of Australia’s centre for sporting excellence in Canberra.

Labor has constantly pressured the Coalition over its cuts to sport and its lack of investment in the AIS, and the Budget response was well overdue.

However much of the new money to enhance facilities at the AIS does not arrive until 2005-06.

There are many in the sporting sector who have been let down by a Budget bereft of any long-term strategy for Australian sport.

There was an expectation that after years of cuts, the Coalition would actually unveil some sort of policy vision or agenda for developing Australia’s sporting infrastructure.

Once again this expectation has not been met, and the Minister for Sport is still basing the Coalition’s entire policy agenda on Backing Australia’s Sporting Ability, a 10 page glossy booklet full of motherhood statements and feel good rhetoric.

The Minister for Sport, Rod Kemp, has taken his predecessor’s mantle of being a ‘do nothing’ Minister and squandered an opportunity to provide leadership and a comprehensive agenda for sport and physical activity in Australia.

Media contact: Simon Tatz on 6277 3334 or 0418 488 295

15 May 2002 - Media Release

When too much sport is too much

Roy and HG used to quip, “too much sport is barely enough”.

For many sport fans, however, the current fiasco over free-to-air coverage of sport shows that too much sport might indeed be too much, at least when one broadcaster tries to accommodate the demands of sports fans across Australia.

Viewers already know what happens when one station has too many sports to broadcast: delayed coverage of AFL matches finishing after 2 am in some States; no live broadcast of Rugby League matches in others. While Foxtel now has the rights to slightly delayed AFL games and broadcasts all but two Rugby League games live, there are still many Australians who cannot afford, or cannot access, pay television.

When the soccer World Cup begins in earnest in June, host broadcaster Channel 9 will be faced with satisfying the demands of soccer, Australian Rules, Rugby League, tennis and Formula One fans.

In order to accommodate their commitments to these sports, it appears that the sporting codes will have to reschedule their games to accommodate the 9 Network.

On June 7, for example, Channel 9 has the rights to the Argentina vs England World Cup match; the Kangaroos vs Richmond AFL match and the Rugby League match of the round. On June 26, the third Rugby League State of Origin match clashes with a World Cup semi-final. No doubt Channel 9 will broadcast the League fixture before their World Cup commitments - hoping that there are no delays as the World Cup games must be broadcast live.

Trying to satisfy everyone seems to have satisfied no one, and the Government has an obligation to fix this situation up.

Senator Alston is the Minister responsible for mishandling free-to-air coverage of sport. He is refusing to take responsibility for this situation. He is refusing to acknowledge that sports fans feel cheated that they can’t watch for free (or live) their favourite sport. He is refusing to acknowledge that many people cannot afford pay television.

Senator Alston must ensure that these major sports are screened at accessible times by a range of free-to-air broadcasters. Sports fans are sick of Alston’s rhetoric; they just want a quality product shown at a reasonable time.

Media contact: Simon Tatz on 6277 3334 or 0418 488 295

14 May 2002 - Media Release

ICT ignored; NOIE knee-capped

The Coalition has demonstrated that its commitment to the Information and Communications Technology (ICT) sector was nothing more than a passing fad, the Shadow Minister for Information Technology, Senator Kate Lundy, said last night.

“In a budget largely devoid of any mention of the crucial ICT industry sector, the only notable mentions have been the knee-capping of the National Office of the Information Economy (NOIE) and the reduction of the first instalment of funding to the ICT Centre of Excellence program,” Senator Lundy said.

NOIE has lost responsibility for ICT industry development:

“NOIE has transferred to the Department of Communications Information Technology and the Arts (DCITA), those functions directly related to the growth and development of the Information and Communications Technology (ICT) industry. Those functions include the Centre of Excellence program and other international activities such as supporting international telecommunications forums.”

(Government Budget Papers, Portfolio Budget Statement Communications (Information Technology and the Arts) Budget Related Paper No. 1.3, page 387)

“Clearly NOIE is being stripped of a significant area of policy and programs, a significant knee-capping which can only be interpreted as a loss of commitment to and confidence in the Office by the Minister,” Senator Lundy said.

“Symbolic of this worrying development is a reduction of the first instalment of funding to the ICT Centre of Excellence program, which has been reduced from the promised $8.8 million to $7.5 million.

“Information regarding the forward years’ expenditure on this $130 million project has not been disclosed in the budget papers, so Labor will be pursuing this in Estimates.

“Finally, it appears that the Coalition’s commitment to “Competitive and effective communications and information technology industries and services and improved access to Government information” (Outcome 2) has been reduced by around 15% or around $76 million. We will be investigating precisely which programs have had their funding cut through Senate Budget Estimates hearings.

“The expectations of the ICT sector were very low, which in itself is a sad state of affairs, but their disappointment in a Government lacking in foresight in vision is justified. As demonstrated by this budget, any commitment to ICT was clearly a passing fad.” Senator Lundy concluded.

Media Contact: Simon Tatz: 02 6277 3334; 0418 488 295

8 May 2002 - Media Release

Domestic sports coverage suffers another setback

The reduction of televised Australian domestic sport coverage brought about by the demise of Channel 7’s pay-TV sports channel C7 is yet another blow to sporting fans.

C7 had broadcast domestic cricket, basketball, soccer, hockey, cycling, the Victorian football League and the Queensland Rugby League. The future coverage of these sports is now in doubt.

While Foxtel and the free-to-air networks continue to provide a high standard of coverage of the major domestic sporting competitions, the so-called ‘second-tier’ sports are struggling in an increasing competitive and contracting market.

It’s about time the Howard Government did something to address this problem and gave sporting fans the respect and priorities they deserve.

Australian sport has been hit by one crisis after another, yet the Government has repeatedly failed to act on behalf of sporting organisations, competitions, players and fans to ensure the long-term viability of our domestic sporting competitions.

First, the collapse of Ansett Airlines drastically reduced the level of sponsorship for Australian sport and left many teams and competitions without sponsorship and access to ‘in kind’ sponsorship, such as cheaper air travel.

Next, the massive increases in public liability insurance resulted in the cancellation of many sporting and recreational events and put in jeopardy the future of many other events.

Then came the debacle over AFL coverage, which highlighted Senator Alston’s inability to ensure that sports coverage is adequate and that broadcasters don’t hoard rights.

Now, many other domestic sports may lose their pay-television coverage, thanks to the loss of C7.

Sports Minister Rod Kemp needs to get off the bench and start resolving the problems affecting domestic sport.

Media contact: Simon Tatz on 6277 3334 or 0418 488 295

7 May 2002 - Media Release

Government fails local IT SMEs – again

The Department of Veterans’ Affairs IT outsourcing contract was a lesson in how not to support local IT enterprises, the Shadow Minister for Information Technology, Senator Kate Lundy said today.

Following on from revelations that an IT outsourcing contract that the Coalition boasted would only cost $65 million in 1997 has in reality cost $140 million, Senator Lundy criticised the contract for its failure to guarantee any business from local small to medium enterprises (SMEs).

“When the DVA IT outsourcing contract was signed in 1997, the Howard Government told us that it would result in job creation and small business growth, especially in regional Australia. Yet despite this commitment, the contract did not specify either the number of contracts to be awarded to SMEs, or the total value of these contracts.

“As a result from a contract worth $140 million, the contractor only sub-contracted out $3.5 million to SMEs,” Senator Lundy said.

“One of the principles of Commonwealth procurement should be to support the development of the local ICT industry, the future of Australia’s knowledge-based economy. This contract is yet another example of how the Coalition Government has failed small to medium IT businesses.”

Media contact: Jason Ives on 6277 3334 or 0418 488 295

7 May 2002 - Media Release

Coalition’s outsourcing policies are neglecting ICT job creation

The continuing fall in the ICT jobs market is an important reminder that the Howard Government should place more importance on supporting industry development when it considers IT outsourcing tenders, the Shadow Minister for Information Technology, Senator Kate Lundy, said today.

Speaking on the back of the findings of the recently released Olivier Internet Job Index, which indicate that Australian IT job advertisements have fallen 73 per cent in the last year, including a 3 percent drop in the past month, Senator Lundy said “while IT employment depends upon the overall health of the economy, the Government needs to ensure that its IT outsourcing policies have the maximum positive impact on Australian ICT job creation.”

“Currently there is no indication that this is happening.

“Yesterday’s report from the Australian National Audit Office on the Department of Veterans’ Affairs IT outsourcing contract said that from an IT outsourcing contract estimated to come to a total cost of $140 million, only $3.5 million dollars had currently flowed to local small to medium enterprises.

“Given that small businesses are claimed to be the engine of employment, if these proportions are repeated in other Government Departments and Agencies in the midst of IT outsourcing contracts, then the Howard regime is not playing its part to stimulate job creation in the ICT sector,” Senator Lundy concluded.

Media contact: Jason Ives on 6277 3334 or 0418 488 295

6 May 2002 - Media Release

Reckless IT outsourcing promises come back to haunt Coalition

Today’s Department of Veterans’ Affairs IT outsourcing blow-out is more compelling evidence that the Howard government has no idea how to manage its information technology requirements, the Shadow Minister for Information Technology, Senator Kate Lundy said tonight.

“The legacy of the Coalition’s IT outsourcing program of the last six years is beginning to come back to haunt the Government as taxpayers discover its true cost,” Senator Lundy said.

“The fact is that five years ago the Howard Government jumped on the outsourcing bandwagon, shamelessly promising savings that by and large, have never eventuated.  In this case, the promised savings of $20 million, which the Government was keen to announce at the time, have evaporated, and the final cost of $140 million was more than double the estimated costs of the contract of $65 million.

“The reality of IT contracts is that costs go up; and this blow-out demonstrates that the government has been irresponsible in promising the savings it did,” Senator Lundy said.

“The blow-out in the cost of the DVA IT outsourcing arrangement demonstrates that the Howard Government never had the faintest notion of the enormity of the challenges of the strategic management of information and the technology behind it.

“The Government should now come clean so that tax-payers know what other IT outsourcing blow-outs are in store for them,” Senator Lundy concluded.

Media contact: Jason Ives on 6277 3334 or 0418 488 295

2 May 2002 - Media Alert

New magazine to fill netball information gap

Earlier today the Shadow Minister for Sport, Senator Kate Lundy, launched Australian Netballer, an exciting new information source for players, coaches and umpires of Australia’s largest adult participation sport.

Published nationally, but based here in Canberra, Australian Netballer is the creation of former ACT representative player Anne Quinn, who turned to publishing when she saw that there is currently no general national netball magazine in Australia.

At the launch, Senator Lundy said, “Australian Netballer is a fantastic magazine coming out of Canberra.  It will provide all the information and news about the sport that, until now, netball fans and participants have been missing out on.”

Netball Facts

bulletNetball Australia (the national netball association) estimates that there are 1.2 million netball players (junior and senior) in Australia
bulletThe Australian Netball Team is currently holds both the World Championship title and 1998 Commonwealth Gold Medal.
bulletAustralia’s national Netball league is considered to be the best national netball competition in the world

For more information about this great magazine, please contact Anne Quinn on (02) 6231 2452 or visit the website at http://www.ausnetballer.com.au

Media contact For Senator Kate Lundy: Jason Ives 6277 3334 or 0418 488 295

AUSTRALIAN NETBALLER - MEDIA RELEASE

New magazine to fill netball information gap

Starved of interesting and in-depth news of their sport, Australia’s estimated 400,000 netball enthusiasts can take heart this week with the launch of a new Canberra-based national netball magazine, Australian Netballer.

To be launched by the Shadow Minister for Sport Senator Kate Lundy, Australian Netballer is the brainchild of former ACT representative player turned publisher Anne Quinn, and promises to fill the current information gap in Australia’s largest participation sport.

“Australian Netballer aims to provide more information for Australia's netball enthusiasts, to establish a place for debating and analysing netball issues, and to take an interested look at netball culture and the diversity of the netball community,” said Anne.

“It will provide practical information for coaches, in-depth discussion about netball and broader sport issues, and coverage of netball events and personalities.

‘I hope that Australian Netballer will become a vehicle for sharing information about this enormously popular sport. Netball has a rich culture and there’s a vast amount of playing, coaching and administrative expertise in Australia.

“It’s time we started to recognise this and let everyone else see it too. Although media coverage of netball is improving, it still isn’t commensurate with Australia’s status in the netball world as World Champion and Commonwealth Games gold medallist,” Anne said.

As well as covering the game at the elite level, Australian Netballer will investigate what’s happening at the local and rural level and examine how the game is encouraging girls and women to take part in physical activity and to become team members and leaders. 

“I want to have a look at how the game might be shaping people’s lives,” Anne said.

Australian Netballer will be published monthly during the netball season (April to October) and bi-monthly in the off-season (December and February) and will feature contributions from experienced netball journalists, players and coaches. It will be available in newsagencies around the country and by subscription at a cost of $4.00, including GST.

 Launch of Australian Netballer
by Senator Kate Lundy
10:30am Thursday 2 May 2002
ACT Netball Centre, Northbourne Ave, Lyneham, ACT

For more information about this great magazine, please contact Anne Quinn on (02) 6231 2452

2 May 2002 - Media Release

Howard Government’s continued scorn for Canberra

The Coalition’s decision to flog off a huge chunk of the Tuggeranong Town Centre demonstrates that it has no respect for the democratic rights of Canberrans, the Federal Labor Senator for the ACT, Kate Lundy, said today.

“The advertised sale of the Greenway site, without any consultation with the elected representatives of the ACT, defies belief,” Senator Lundy said.

“In the interests of his budget bottom line, John Howard has decided to ignore the Stanhope Government, and sell land to the highest bidder without any regard to Territory planning processes.

“This sale represents a resolution to prevent local residents from deciding how they want their city to be developed for the future.

“The people of the ACT have elected their own Territory government, but the Coalition has said ‘We are not interested in your opinions, we will say how your city should be run.’  Once again, they have decided to treat us with contempt.

“The only acceptable answer to this insult is for the Coalition to return the land to the people of the ACT, as befits the spirit of self-government.

“To this end the Liberal ACT Senator, Margaret Reid, should be on the phone to John Howard now, representing her electors, and telling him that this treatment is unacceptable, and the sale should be scrapped,” Senator Lundy concluded.

The proposed land sale is just the latest of a series of unwarranted Coalition intrusions into Canberran democracy.  It follows the scuttling of local efforts at drug law reform, and the attempt to pervert the course of democracy in relation to the Gungahlin Drive extension during last year’s local election.

Media contact: Jason Ives 6277 3334 or 0418 488 295

Next